Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 20 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
Subset |
VOLUME I V , NUMBER 12
PENN JONES' T H E
CONTINUING
INQUIRY
JULY 22, 1980
The Killing of Allard Lowenstein
by Christopher Sharrett
The death of Al Lowenstein last March and the
more recent attempt on the life of Vernon
Jordan (an incident closely resembling the
King assassination, complete with shooters in
a vacant lot) form a morass of new leads regarding
possible attempts to derail the current
campaigns by political leaders. Lowenstein
was a Kennedy insider and one of the few
persons to gain the Senator's ear on questions
dealing with the RFK assassination. Jordan
was a Carter supporter and a crucial figure in
a time of unrest for many blacks. The most
..*^plexing case at the moment is the Lowen-
^cein death, mainly because of his reputation
as one of the most crusading researchers on
the RFK as well as the JFK assassinations, and
also because of the strange circumstances of
his killing by alleged assassin Dennis Sweeney.
What follows is second-hand information, largely
because the facts in this case are still very
fuzzy and confirmation on many points is difficult.
The chief sources of information are
conversations I have had with people in the
New York area familiar with Lowenstein's
career; various past articles on SDS, SNCC and
the National Student Association; a particularly
crucial article by Teresa Carpenter in The
Vi11 age Voice.^ One point that seems obvious
in studying this case is the need to investigate
the career of Allard Lowenstein as much
as the motivation of Dennis Sweeney in killing
him.
As per custom, the early press accounts of aspects
of Sweeney's background and Lowenstein's
public role were inaccurate. The media claimed
that Sweeney was a "disgruntled legal client"
ojA Lowenstein; reports also called Lowenstein
:^ activist in the Dump Johnson movement of the
1960s, failing to mention anything about his
much more controversial position as RFK researcher
throughout the 1970s. Accounts also
claimed Sweeney was a stranger to Lowenstein,
when in fact the two men had a relationship
going back to the early 60s. Of course the
burning question for researchers is whether or
not this was in some sense a political murder.
According to the Voice article, rumors somehow
began circulating in New York immediately
after the killing that Sweeney was an assassin
"working his way" through the Kennedy campaign
with the intention of eventually killing Ted
Kennedy himself. The reasoning behind this
is cloudy, but there are some crucial points
which may put interested researchers on the
right track in understanding this case.
Although Dennis Sweeney could be called a
disturbed loner at the time of the Lowenstein
murder, he once had a totally different image.
He was known to the New Left in the early 60s
as a very ardent campus activist at Stanford
University and a tireless civil rights worker.
Sweeney took part in some of the freedom rides
and in one instance survived a bombing in Mississippi
while working on an integration case.
It was during his student days at Stanford that
Sweeney first met Al Lowenstein, when the latter
served as Visiting Professor of Political
Science for a year. Lowenstein had long since
made a name in activist circles, beginning in
the early 50s when he was the first president
of the National Student Association. At
Stanford Lowenstein was still passionately involved
in activist causes and prone to be
something of a guru to his followers; contrary
to the campus temperament in the 60s, Lowenstein
wanted tight organization and a certain
amount of discipline in political activity.
Similarly, Sweeney wanted to catch Lowenstein's
attention as a model organizer: he wanted to
be the chief protege and have a one-on-one
relationship with a man rapidly becoming his
idol. Lowenstein was apparently amenable to
this after a period of watching Sweeney. In
fact, Lowenstein cultivated the friendships with
a number of young men involved in the civil
rights movement to the point that he was accused
Object Description
| Title | The Killing Of Allard Lowenstein by Christopher Sharrett |
| Volume No. | 4 |
| Issue No. | 12 |
| Date | 1980-07-22 |
| Series | V. Personal – E. Publications – 1. The Continuing Inquiry |
| Uniform Title | The Continuing Inquiry |
| Collection Title | Poage Library - JFK - Penn Jones Collection |
| Custodian | Poage Legislative Library |
| ID | 15p-jfkjones-ci-v4_1980-07-22 |
| Resource Type | Newsletter |
| Format | Text |
| Rights | http://www.baylor.edu/lib/digitization/digitalrights |
Description
| Title | Page 1 |
| Series | V. Personal – E. Publications – 1. The Continuing Inquiry |
| Uniform Title | The Continuing Inquiry |
| Collection Title | Poage Library - JFK - Penn Jones Collection |
| Custodian | Poage Legislative Library |
| Resource Type | Newsletter |
| Format | Text |
| Full Text | VOLUME I V , NUMBER 12 PENN JONES' T H E CONTINUING INQUIRY JULY 22, 1980 The Killing of Allard Lowenstein by Christopher Sharrett The death of Al Lowenstein last March and the more recent attempt on the life of Vernon Jordan (an incident closely resembling the King assassination, complete with shooters in a vacant lot) form a morass of new leads regarding possible attempts to derail the current campaigns by political leaders. Lowenstein was a Kennedy insider and one of the few persons to gain the Senator's ear on questions dealing with the RFK assassination. Jordan was a Carter supporter and a crucial figure in a time of unrest for many blacks. The most ..*^plexing case at the moment is the Lowen- ^cein death, mainly because of his reputation as one of the most crusading researchers on the RFK as well as the JFK assassinations, and also because of the strange circumstances of his killing by alleged assassin Dennis Sweeney. What follows is second-hand information, largely because the facts in this case are still very fuzzy and confirmation on many points is difficult. The chief sources of information are conversations I have had with people in the New York area familiar with Lowenstein's career; various past articles on SDS, SNCC and the National Student Association; a particularly crucial article by Teresa Carpenter in The Vi11 age Voice.^ One point that seems obvious in studying this case is the need to investigate the career of Allard Lowenstein as much as the motivation of Dennis Sweeney in killing him. As per custom, the early press accounts of aspects of Sweeney's background and Lowenstein's public role were inaccurate. The media claimed that Sweeney was a "disgruntled legal client" ojA Lowenstein; reports also called Lowenstein :^ activist in the Dump Johnson movement of the 1960s, failing to mention anything about his much more controversial position as RFK researcher throughout the 1970s. Accounts also claimed Sweeney was a stranger to Lowenstein, when in fact the two men had a relationship going back to the early 60s. Of course the burning question for researchers is whether or not this was in some sense a political murder. According to the Voice article, rumors somehow began circulating in New York immediately after the killing that Sweeney was an assassin "working his way" through the Kennedy campaign with the intention of eventually killing Ted Kennedy himself. The reasoning behind this is cloudy, but there are some crucial points which may put interested researchers on the right track in understanding this case. Although Dennis Sweeney could be called a disturbed loner at the time of the Lowenstein murder, he once had a totally different image. He was known to the New Left in the early 60s as a very ardent campus activist at Stanford University and a tireless civil rights worker. Sweeney took part in some of the freedom rides and in one instance survived a bombing in Mississippi while working on an integration case. It was during his student days at Stanford that Sweeney first met Al Lowenstein, when the latter served as Visiting Professor of Political Science for a year. Lowenstein had long since made a name in activist circles, beginning in the early 50s when he was the first president of the National Student Association. At Stanford Lowenstein was still passionately involved in activist causes and prone to be something of a guru to his followers; contrary to the campus temperament in the 60s, Lowenstein wanted tight organization and a certain amount of discipline in political activity. Similarly, Sweeney wanted to catch Lowenstein's attention as a model organizer: he wanted to be the chief protege and have a one-on-one relationship with a man rapidly becoming his idol. Lowenstein was apparently amenable to this after a period of watching Sweeney. In fact, Lowenstein cultivated the friendships with a number of young men involved in the civil rights movement to the point that he was accused |
| Rights | http://www.baylor.edu/lib/digitization/digitalrights |